The Warrick Area Plan Commission spent 6 months on an ordinance, only to have it tabled in a few hours.
The APC held what ended up being a three-hour hearing on their proposed data center ordinance, Monday July 13. The subject drew just under 200 attendees and dozens of public comments.
Visitors filled the meeting room and the stairs outside. Several were wearing red shirts to express their non-support of data centers.
“I understand that the trades want jobs,” said Jim Maurer, who joined in, wearing red. “But you can't give them jobs at the expense of the rest of the people in the county.”
His concerns were environmental and financial.
The ordinance that was tabled had rules and definitions for three levels of data centers. The law would have fully prohibited large data centers of more than 40,000 square feet, and created regulations on medium data centers. These are 10,000 to 40,000 square feet.
Public comments were nearly evenly split. More than half were wary of data centers, the rest were in favor of the facilities for economic reasons.
Several skilled trades workers and builders spoke in favor of data centers and the jobs created during construction and maintenance, as did advocates of economic development.
Sarah Seaton is Warrick County Commission President. She attended as an individual, and commented in favor of data centers.
“My biggest concern is that if we place an extensive moratorium on any data center development within Warrick County, it's basically just a full stop. In the world of technology, two years is a lifetime, and that doesn't really just put a pause on things. It really just puts a stop to any opportunities that might come to Warrick County.”
Both sides wanted more care taken with the ordinance. There were critiques on whether limiting data centers by square footage is ideal, as opposed to restricting by megawatts.
There were conflicting comments on whether data centers would raise utility rates, or stimulate the local economy.
Those in favor of data centers wanted the moratorium on large facilities to be removed. In the end, the APC decided to make two motions — one was to table their ordinance to make time to do more research.
The other was to put a moratorium on all projects until December, to block any new projects in the meantime. The moratorium is technically just a recommendation and needs to be passed by the County Commission to take effect.
Support independent journalism today. You rely on WNIN to stay informed, and we depend on you to make our work possible. Give to grow our local reporting today. Donate